Explorer vs Gbs50-K2178
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and Gbs50-K2178 (Gongboshi Robot Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom

- Gbs50-K2178—

Year First Available
- Explorer2009

- Gbs50-K2178—

Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments

- Gbs50-K21780 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE

- Gbs50-K2178ACTIVE

Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Explorer20 kg

- Gbs50-K217850 kg

IP Rating (Arm)
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178IP 65

Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm

- Gbs50-K21782,178 mm

Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K21784

Repeatability
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178±0.2 mm

Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg

- Gbs50-K2178616 kg

Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178continuous 24 7

Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit

- Gbs50-K2178—

Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178wired touch

Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178none

Predictive Maintenance
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178ml based

End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178ISO 9409-1

Internal Cable Routing
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178through arm

Commercial
Service Network
- Explorer—

- Gbs50-K2178regional

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 50 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | IP 65 |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 2,178 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.2 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 18.6 kg | 616 kg |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | — |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired touch |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | none |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | ml based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | Gbs50-K2178 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, Gbs50-K2178 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and Gbs50-K2178?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. Gbs50-K2178 is made by Gongboshi Robot Technology Co., Ltd..
How do Explorer and Gbs50-K2178 compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. Gbs50-K2178 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to Gbs50-K2178?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. Gbs50-K2178 has a reach of 2220 mm.
Are Explorer and Gbs50-K2178 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and Gbs50-K2178?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs Gbs50-K2178 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.