Explorer vs IEG PLUS 260-080
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and IEG PLUS 260-080 (Weiss Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Prices in
View savedOptimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- IEG PLUS 260-080Germany
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- IEG PLUS 260-080—
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- IEG PLUS 260-0800 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- IEG PLUS 260-080ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- IEG PLUS 260-080—
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- IEG PLUS 260-080—
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- IEG PLUS 260-080—
IP Rating (Arm)
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080IP54
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080continuous 24 7
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- IEG PLUS 260-080GRIPLINK-ET4
Programming Languages
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080other
Offline Programming
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080GRIPLINK
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080vendor supported
IoT / Cloud Platform
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080IO-Link
Commercial
Service Network
- Explorer—
- IEG PLUS 260-080regional
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | — |
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | — |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | — | IP54 |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | GRIPLINK-ET4 |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | other |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | GRIPLINK |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | vendor supported |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | IO-Link |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Teach Pendant Type, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | IEG PLUS 260-080 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, IEG PLUS 260-080 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and IEG PLUS 260-080?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. IEG PLUS 260-080 is made by Weiss Robotics, based in DE.
How do Explorer and IEG PLUS 260-080 compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. IEG PLUS 260-080 grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Explorer and IEG PLUS 260-080 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and IEG PLUS 260-080?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
About this comparison
Explorer vs IEG PLUS 260-080 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.