Explorer vs KAWASAKI MX700N
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and KAWASAKI MX700N (Kawasaki Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- KAWASAKI MX700NJapan
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- KAWASAKI MX700N2010
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- KAWASAKI MX700N0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ExplorerContact for quote
- KAWASAKI MX700N$42,000–$48,000 USD
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- KAWASAKI MX700NACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- KAWASAKI MX700N—
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- KAWASAKI MX700N700 kg
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- KAWASAKI MX700N2,540 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700N6
Repeatability
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700N±0.5 mm
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Ncontinuous 24 7
Vibration Damping
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Nactive model based
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- KAWASAKI MX700NF04
Programming Languages
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700NKawasaki AS (Advanced Servo)
Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Nwired button
Offline Programming
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700NKawasaki K-ROSET
Connectivity
IoT / Cloud Platform
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700NKawasaki K- iPS (Intelligent Production System)
Predictive Maintenance
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Nthreshold based
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700NISO 9409-1
Internal Cable Routing
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Nthrough arm
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ExplorerContact for quote
- KAWASAKI MX700N$42,000–$48,000 USD
Service Network
- Explorer—
- KAWASAKI MX700Nglobal
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2010 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $42,000–$48,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | — |
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 700 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 2,540 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.5 mm |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Vibration Damping (values differ) | — | active model based |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | F04 |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | Kawasaki AS (Advanced Servo) |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired button |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | Kawasaki K-ROSET |
| Connectivity | ||
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | Kawasaki K- iPS (Intelligent Production System) |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | threshold based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $42,000–$48,000 USD |
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | KAWASAKI MX700N |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $45,000 |
| Payback period | — | 10.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $205,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +456% |
Explorer has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and KAWASAKI MX700N?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. KAWASAKI MX700N is made by Kawasaki Robotics, based in JP.
When were Explorer and KAWASAKI MX700N launched?
Explorer launched in 2009. KAWASAKI MX700N launched in 2010.
How do Explorer and KAWASAKI MX700N compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. KAWASAKI MX700N grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to KAWASAKI MX700N?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. KAWASAKI MX700N has a reach of 2540 mm.
Are Explorer and KAWASAKI MX700N in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and KAWASAKI MX700N?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs KAWASAKI MX700N compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.