Explorer vs KR 10 R900 WP
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and KR 10 R900 WP (KUKA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- KR 10 R900 WPGermany
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- KR 10 R900 WP—
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- KR 10 R900 WP0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- KR 10 R900 WPACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- KR 10 R900 WP10 kg
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- KR 10 R900 WP53 kg
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- KR 10 R900 WP901.5 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—
- KR 10 R900 WP6
Repeatability
- Explorer—
- KR 10 R900 WP±0.03 mm
IP Rating (Arm)
- Explorer—
- KR 10 R900 WPIP67
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- KR 10 R900 WPKR C5 micro; KR C4 compact
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 10 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | 53 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 901.5 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.03 mm |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | KR C5 micro; KR C4 compact |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | KR 10 R900 WP |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, KR 10 R900 WP have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and KR 10 R900 WP?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. KR 10 R900 WP is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE.
How do Explorer and KR 10 R900 WP compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. KR 10 R900 WP grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to KR 10 R900 WP?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. KR 10 R900 WP has a reach of 901.5 mm.
Are Explorer and KR 10 R900 WP in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and KR 10 R900 WP?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs KR 10 R900 WP compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.