Explorer vs KR 360 R2800-2
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and KR 360 R2800-2 (KUKA Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom

- KR 360 R2800-2Germany
Year First Available
- Explorer2009

- KR 360 R2800-2—
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments

- KR 360 R2800-20 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE

- KR 360 R2800-2ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm

- KR 360 R2800-22,800 mm
Repeatability
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2±0.08 mm
Payload
- Explorer20 kg

- KR 360 R2800-2360 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2IP65
Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-26
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg

- KR 360 R2800-21,660 kg
IP Rating (Wrist)
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2IP65/IP67
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2continuous 24 7
Safety
Dual Check Safety
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2Yes
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit

- KR 360 R2800-2KR C5
Programming Languages
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2KRL
Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2smart pad
Offline Programming
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2KUKA.Sim
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2community
IoT / Cloud Platform
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2KUKA Connect
Predictive Maintenance
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2threshold based
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2ISO 9409-1
Internal Cable Routing
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2through arm and wrist
Commercial
Service Network
- Explorer—

- KR 360 R2800-2global
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Germany |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 2,800 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | ±0.08 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 360 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | — | IP65 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 18.6 kg | 1,660 kg |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | — | IP65/IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Safety | ||
| Dual Check Safety (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | KR C5 |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | KRL |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | smart pad |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | KUKA.Sim |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | community |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | KUKA Connect |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | threshold based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm and wrist |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | KR 360 R2800-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, KR 360 R2800-2 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and KR 360 R2800-2?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. KR 360 R2800-2 is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE.
How do Explorer and KR 360 R2800-2 compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. KR 360 R2800-2 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to KR 360 R2800-2?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. KR 360 R2800-2 has a reach of 2800 mm.
Are Explorer and KR 360 R2800-2 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and KR 360 R2800-2?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs KR 360 R2800-2 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.