Explorer vs LPH-040
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and LPH-040 (DENSO) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- LPH-040Japan
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- LPH-0402019
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- LPH-0400 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ExplorerContact for quote
- LPH-040$5,392 USD
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- LPH-040ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- LPH-0403 kg
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- LPH-04016 kg
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- LPH-040400 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—
- LPH-0404
Repeatability
- Explorer—
- LPH-040±0.02 mm
Max TCP Speed
- Explorer—
- LPH-0404.7 m/s
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—
- LPH-040multi shift
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- LPH-040RC8
Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—
- LPH-040no pendant (browser UI)
Offline Programming
- Explorer—
- LPH-040WINCAPS III Offline Software
End-Effector
Pneumatic Lines
- Explorer—
- LPH-0403
Electrical Lines
- Explorer—
- LPH-04015
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ExplorerContact for quote
- LPH-040$5,392 USD
Service Network
- Explorer—
- LPH-040global
Expected Service Life
- Explorer—
- LPH-0405 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $5,392 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | 3 kg |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | 16 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 400 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.02 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 4.7 m/s |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | multi shift |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | RC8 |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | no pendant (browser UI) |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | WINCAPS III Offline Software |
| End-Effector | ||
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | — | 15 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $5,392 USD |
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | — | 5 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | LPH-040 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $5,392 |
| Payback period | — | 1.3 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $244,608 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +4537% |
Explorer has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and LPH-040?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. LPH-040 is made by DENSO, based in JP.
When were Explorer and LPH-040 launched?
Explorer launched in 2009. LPH-040 launched in 2019.
How do Explorer and LPH-040 compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. LPH-040 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to LPH-040?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. LPH-040 has a reach of 400 mm.
Are Explorer and LPH-040 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and LPH-040?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs LPH-040 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.