Explorer vs Mantis™
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and Mantis™ (FBR Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- Mantis™United States
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- Mantis™2025
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- Mantis™0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- ExplorerContact for quote
- Mantis™$630,000 USD
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- Mantis™ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- Mantis™—
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- Mantis™5 kg
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- Mantis™900 mm
Repeatability
- Explorer—
- Mantis™±0.03 mm
Max TCP Speed
- Explorer—
- Mantis™10 m/s
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- Mantis™—
Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—
- Mantis™no pendant (browser UI)
Commercial
Price (USD)
- ExplorerContact for quote
- Mantis™$630,000 USD
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | 2025 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $630,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Robot Weight (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 5 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | 900 mm |
| Repeatability (values differ) | — | ±0.03 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | — | 10 m/s |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | — |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | no pendant (browser UI) |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $630,000 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | Mantis™ |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $630,000 |
| Payback period | — | 151.2 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | -$380,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | -60% |
Explorer has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and Mantis™?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. Mantis™ is made by FBR Ltd, based in US.
When were Explorer and Mantis™ launched?
Explorer launched in 2009. Mantis™ launched in 2025.
How do Explorer and Mantis™ compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. Mantis™ grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
How does the reach of Explorer compare to Mantis™?
Explorer has a reach of 2500 mm. Mantis™ has a reach of 8000 mm.
Are Explorer and Mantis™ in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and Mantis™?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs Mantis™ compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.