Explorer vs Robo Pack System
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and Robo Pack System (Bihl+Wiedemann) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- Robo Pack System—
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- Robo Pack System—
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- Robo Pack System0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- Robo Pack SystemACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- Robo Pack System—
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- Robo Pack System—
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- Robo Pack System—
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack Systemcontinuous 24 7
Safety
Safety Category
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack SystemCat.4 PLe
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- Robo Pack System—
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack Systemnone
IoT / Cloud Platform
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack SystemASi-5 with OPC UA interface to cloud databases
Predictive Maintenance
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack Systemml based
Commercial
Service Network
- Explorer—
- Robo Pack Systemglobal
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 20 kg | — |
| Robot Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 18.6 kg | — |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,500 mm | — |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.4 PLe |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | none |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | ASi-5 with OPC UA interface to cloud databases |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | ml based |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Degrees of Freedom, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Teach Pendant Type, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | Robo Pack System |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, Robo Pack System have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and Robo Pack System?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. Robo Pack System is made by Bihl+Wiedemann.
How do Explorer and Robo Pack System compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. Robo Pack System grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Explorer and Robo Pack System in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and Robo Pack System?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs Robo Pack System compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.