Explorer vs RoboFinisher
Side-by-side comparison of Explorer (OC Robotics) and RoboFinisher (Metalcraft Automation Group) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- ExplorerUnited Kingdom
- RoboFinisherUnited States
Year First Available
- Explorer2009
- RoboFinisher—
Verified Deployments
- Explorer0 Deployments
- RoboFinisher0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- ExplorerACTIVE
- RoboFinisherACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- Explorer2,500 mm
- RoboFinisher—
Payload
- Explorer20 kg
- RoboFinisher25 kg
Degrees of Freedom
- Explorer—
- RoboFinisher6
Robot Weight
- Explorer18.6 kg
- RoboFinisher—
Performance
Duty Cycle
- Explorer—
- RoboFinishermulti shift
Safety
Safe Zone Count
- Explorer—
- RoboFinisher3
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- ExplorerControl and simulation unit
- RoboFinisherFanuc (specific model not listed)
Teach Pendant Type
- Explorer—
- RoboFinisherwired button
Connectivity
ROS-Industrial Support
- Explorer—
- RoboFinishernone
Predictive Maintenance
- Explorer—
- RoboFinishernone
End-Effector
Tool Changer (ISO)
- Explorer—
- RoboFinisherproprietary
Commercial
Service Network
- Explorer—
- RoboFinisherregional
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United Kingdom | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2009 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers) (values differ) | 2,500 mm | — |
| Payload (values differ) | 20 kg | 25 kg |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 18.6 kg | — |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | multi shift |
| Safety | ||
| Safe Zone Count (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | Control and simulation unit | Fanuc (specific model not listed) |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired button |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | — | none |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | none |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Changer (ISO) (values differ) | — | proprietary |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | regional |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Repeatability, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, IP Rating (Arm), IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Tool Flange Standard, Internal Cable Routing, Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Explorer | RoboFinisher |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Explorer, RoboFinisher have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Explorer and RoboFinisher?
Explorer is made by OC Robotics, based in GB. RoboFinisher is made by Metalcraft Automation Group, based in US.
How do Explorer and RoboFinisher compare on the Robo Index?
Explorer grades AA on the Robo Index. RoboFinisher grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Explorer and RoboFinisher in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Explorer and RoboFinisher?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Explorer vs RoboFinisher compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.