牛魔王F300 vs Freight 500
Side-by-side comparison of 牛魔王F300 (Alpha Robot) and Freight 500 (Fetch Robotics Inc. (acquired by Zebra Technologies 2021)) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- 牛魔王F300China
- Freight 500United States
Year First Available
- 牛魔王F300—
- Freight 5002014
Verified Deployments
- 牛魔王F3000 Deployments
- Freight 5000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- 牛魔王F300Contact for quote
- Freight 500$35,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- 牛魔王F30016 hrs
- Freight 5009 hrs
Availability Status
- 牛魔王F300ACTIVE
- Freight 500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- 牛魔王F300300 kg
- Freight 500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- 牛魔王F300pallet mover
- Freight 500other
Length
- 牛魔王F300885 mm
- Freight 500—
Width
- 牛魔王F300500 mm
- Freight 5001,016 mm
Min Aisle Width
- 牛魔王F300800 mm
- Freight 500—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- 牛魔王F300lidar slam
- Freight 500other
Obstacle Detection Range
- 牛魔王F30040 m
- Freight 500—
Pedestrian Detection
- 牛魔王F300Yes
- Freight 500—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- 牛魔王F300lifepo4
- Freight 500other
Battery Capacity
- 牛魔王F3001 kWh
- Freight 500—
Auto Docking
- 牛魔王F300Yes
- Freight 500—
Safety
Emergency Stops
- 牛魔王F3001
- Freight 500—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- 牛魔王F300Contact for quote
- Freight 500$35,000 USD
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 16 hrs | 9 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 300 kg | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | pallet mover | other |
| Length (values differ) | 885 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 500 mm | 1,016 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 800 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | other |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | 40 m | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | lifepo4 | other |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1 kWh | — |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $35,000 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | 牛魔王F300 | Freight 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $35,000 |
| Payback period | — | 8.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $215,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +614% |
牛魔王F300 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes 牛魔王F300 and Freight 500?
牛魔王F300 is made by Alpha Robot, based in CN. Freight 500 is made by Fetch Robotics Inc. (acquired by Zebra Technologies 2021), based in US.
How do 牛魔王F300 and Freight 500 compare on the Robo Index?
牛魔王F300 grades A on the Robo Index. Freight 500 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are 牛魔王F300 and Freight 500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between 牛魔王F300 and Freight 500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
牛魔王F300 vs Freight 500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.