Side-by-side comparison of Flyboat ABOT40F (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and C-series carton pick (Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country

Year First Available

Verified Deployments

Price

Battery / Shift Runtime

Availability Status

Payload

AMR Subtype

Length

Width

Min Aisle Width

Robot Weight

Navigation Type

Localization Accuracy

Max Speed (Unloaded)

Battery Chemistry

Battery Capacity

Runtime (Loaded)

API Type

Price (USD)

Pricing Models

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $6,980 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 1,200 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | 791.6 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 560 mm | — |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 950 mm | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 270 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | lidar slam | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 100 mm | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | lifepo4 | other |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1 kWh | — |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $6,980 USD | Contact for quote |
| Pricing Models (values differ) | capex | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Ground Clearance, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Flyboat ABOT40F | C-series carton pick |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $6,980 | No price |
| Payback period | 1.7 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $243,020 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +3482% | — |
C-series carton pick has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
Flyboat ABOT40F is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. C-series carton pick is made by Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
Flyboat ABOT40F grades BBB on the Robo Index. C-series carton pick grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Flyboat ABOT40F vs C-series carton pick compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.