FoxLink AMR vs OTTO
Side-by-side comparison of FoxLink AMR (Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd. (Hon Hai subsidiary)) and OTTO (OTTO Motors) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- FoxLink AMRTaiwan
- OTTOCanada
Year First Available
- FoxLink AMR2015
- OTTO2015
Verified Deployments
- FoxLink AMR0 Deployments
- OTTO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- FoxLink AMR$4,718 USD
- OTTOContact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- FoxLink AMR—
- OTTO6 hrs
Availability Status
- FoxLink AMRACTIVE
- OTTOACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- FoxLink AMR—
- OTTO150 kg
AMR Subtype
- FoxLink AMRother
- OTTOunit load carrier
Robot Weight
- FoxLink AMR0.1 kg
- OTTO—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- FoxLink AMRother
- OTTOother
Pedestrian Detection
- FoxLink AMR—
- OTTOYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- FoxLink AMRother
- OTTOother
Connectivity
API Type
- FoxLink AMR—
- OTTOopen rest
Commercial
Price (USD)
- FoxLink AMR$4,718 USD
- OTTOContact for quote
Warranty
- FoxLink AMR5 yrs
- OTTO—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Taiwan | Canada |
| Year First Available | 2015 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $4,718 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | — | 150 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | unit load carrier |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 0.1 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | other | other |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | — | open rest |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $4,718 USD | Contact for quote |
| Warranty (values differ) | 5 yrs | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | FoxLink AMR | OTTO |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $4,718 | No price |
| Payback period | 1.1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $245,282 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +5199% | — |
OTTO has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes FoxLink AMR and OTTO?
FoxLink AMR is made by Foxconn Industrial Internet Co., Ltd. (Hon Hai subsidiary), based in TW. OTTO is made by OTTO Motors, based in CA.
When were FoxLink AMR and OTTO launched?
FoxLink AMR launched in 2015. OTTO launched in 2015.
How do FoxLink AMR and OTTO compare on the Robo Score?
FoxLink AMR scores 63.9 on the Robo Score. OTTO scores 64.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are FoxLink AMR and OTTO in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between FoxLink AMR and OTTO?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
FoxLink AMR vs OTTO compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.