G1 vs 天链人形机器人T1
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and 天链人形机器人T1 (四川天链机器人股份有限公司) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
G1CN
天链人形机器人T1CN
Year First Available
G12024
天链人形机器人T12024
Verified Deployments
G10 Deployments
天链人形机器人T10 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
G12 hrs
天链人形机器人T1—
Availability Status
G1ACTIVE
天链人形机器人T1ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
G1126 mm
天链人形机器人T1160 mm
Weight
G1—
天链人形机器人T143 kg
Mobility Type
G1bipedal
天链人形机器人T1bipedal
Humanoid Subtype
G1full bipedal
天链人形机器人T1full bipedal
Walking Speed
G1—
天链人形机器人T12.2 m/s
Terrain
G1indoor
天链人形机器人T1—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
G13 kg
天链人形机器人T18 kg
Payload (Peak)
G1—
天链人形机器人T116 kg
Total DOF
G117
天链人形机器人T171
Arm DOF
G17
天链人形机器人T1—
Hand DOF
G1—
天链人形机器人T13
Manipulation Repeatability
G1±0.5 mm
天链人形机器人T1—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
G1100 TOPS
天链人形机器人T1—
Compute Platform
G1NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB
天链人形机器人T1—
Foundation Models
G1UnifoLM-WMA-0
天链人形机器人T1—
Programming
G1code_python, code_ros
天链人形机器人T1—
Battery & Power
Runtime
G12 hrs
天链人形机器人T1—
Software
SDK Languages
G1Python, C++, ROS2
天链人形机器人T1—
ROS Support
G1ros2 vendor
天链人形机器人T1—
Simulation Platforms
G1NVIDIA Isaac Sim
天链人形机器人T1—
Open API
G1open rest
天链人形机器人T1—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
G1production pilot
天链人形机器人T1prototype
Commercial
Applications
G1research_development
天链人形机器人T1research, hazardous_env
G1humanoidUnitree Robotics51.5Trust Score | 天链人形机器人T1humanoid四川天链机器人股份有限公司46.4Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available | 2024 | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | 160 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | — | 43 kg |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype | full bipedal | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 2.2 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 8 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 16 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | 71 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | — | 3 |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | prototype |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | research, hazardous_env |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Trade-offs at a glance
About this comparison
G1 vs 天链人形机器人T1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.