G1 vs Unitree G1-D
Side-by-side comparison of G1 (Unitree Robotics) and Unitree G1-D (Unitree Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
G1CN- Unitree G1-DCN
Year First Available
- G12024
- Unitree G1-D—
Verified Deployments
- G10 Deployments
- Unitree G1-D0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- G12 hrs
- Unitree G1-D2 hrs
Availability Status
- G1ACTIVE
- Unitree G1-DACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- G1126 mm
- Unitree G1-D1680 mm
Mobility Type
- G1bipedal
- Unitree G1-D—
Humanoid Subtype
- G1full bipedal
- Unitree G1-D—
Walking Speed
- G1—
- Unitree G1-D1.5 m/s
Terrain
- G1indoor
- Unitree G1-D—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- G13 kg
- Unitree G1-D—
Total DOF
- G117
- Unitree G1-D19
Arm DOF
- G17
- Unitree G1-D7
Manipulation Repeatability
- G1±0.5 mm
- Unitree G1-D—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- G1100 TOPS
- Unitree G1-DNVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB (100TOPS)
Compute Platform
- G1NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB
- Unitree G1-D—
Foundation Models
- G1UnifoLM-WMA-0
- Unitree G1-D—
Programming
- G1code_python, code_ros
- Unitree G1-D—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- G12 hrs
- Unitree G1-D2 hrs
Software
SDK Languages
- G1Python, C++, ROS2
- Unitree G1-D—
ROS Support
- G1ros2 vendor
- Unitree G1-D—
Simulation Platforms
- G1NVIDIA Isaac Sim
- Unitree G1-D—
Open API
- G1open rest
- Unitree G1-D—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- G1production pilot
- Unitree G1-D—
Commercial
Applications
- G1research_development
- Unitree G1-D—
| G1humanoidUnitree Robotics —Trust Score | Unitree G1-DhumanoidUnitree Robotics —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 126 mm | 1680 mm |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 17 | 19 |
| Arm DOF | 7 | 7 |
| Manipulation Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.5 mm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 100 TOPS | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB (100TOPS) |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | NVIDIA Jetson Orin NX 16GB | — |
| Foundation Models (values differ) | UnifoLM-WMA-0 | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, code_ros | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 vendor | — |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | NVIDIA Isaac Sim | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research_development | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, VLM Capable, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
G1 vs Unitree G1-D compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.