C-series carton pick vs Mouse/Tunnel Low
Side-by-side comparison of C-series carton pick (Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.) and Mouse/Tunnel Low (Bluepath Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- C-series carton pickChina
- Mouse/Tunnel LowSpain
Year First Available
- C-series carton pick2015
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Verified Deployments
- C-series carton pick0 Deployments
- Mouse/Tunnel Low0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- C-series carton pickACTIVE
- Mouse/Tunnel LowACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- C-series carton pick1,200 kg
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
AMR Subtype
- C-series carton pickunit load carrier
- Mouse/Tunnel Lowtugger
Length
- C-series carton pick—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low1,400 mm
Width
- C-series carton pick—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low500 mm
Robot Weight
- C-series carton pick270 kg
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- C-series carton pickother
- Mouse/Tunnel Lowvisual slam,lidar slam,other
Localization Accuracy
- C-series carton pick—
- Mouse/Tunnel Low10 mm
Pedestrian Detection
- C-series carton pick—
- Mouse/Tunnel LowYes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- C-series carton pickother
- Mouse/Tunnel Low—
Reliability
Predictive Maintenance
- C-series carton pick—
- Mouse/Tunnel LowYes
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1,200 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | tugger |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,400 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 500 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 270 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | visual slam,lidar slam,other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 10 mm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | Yes |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | C-series carton pick | Mouse/Tunnel Low |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
C-series carton pick, Mouse/Tunnel Low have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes C-series carton pick and Mouse/Tunnel Low?
C-series carton pick is made by Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Mouse/Tunnel Low is made by Bluepath Robotics, based in ES.
How do C-series carton pick and Mouse/Tunnel Low compare on the Robo Index?
C-series carton pick grades AA on the Robo Index. Mouse/Tunnel Low grades BBB. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are C-series carton pick and Mouse/Tunnel Low in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between C-series carton pick and Mouse/Tunnel Low?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
C-series carton pick vs Mouse/Tunnel Low compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.