P-series goods-to-person vs Picker Robots
Side-by-side comparison of P-series goods-to-person (Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.) and Picker Robots (inVia Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- P-series goods-to-personChina

- Picker RobotsUnited States

Year First Available
- P-series goods-to-person2015

- Picker Robots2015

Verified Deployments
- P-series goods-to-person0 Deployments

- Picker Robots0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- P-series goods-to-person$28,260 USD

- Picker RobotsContact for quote

Battery / Shift Runtime
- P-series goods-to-person—

- Picker Robots10 hrs

Availability Status
- P-series goods-to-personACTIVE

- Picker RobotsACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- P-series goods-to-person500 kg

- Picker Robots18.1 kg

AMR Subtype
- P-series goods-to-persongoods to person

- Picker Robotsgoods to person

Robot Weight
- P-series goods-to-person195 kg

- Picker Robots—

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- P-series goods-to-personother

- Picker Robotsother

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- P-series goods-to-personother

- Picker Robotsother

Commercial
Price (USD)
- P-series goods-to-person$28,260 USD

- Picker RobotsContact for quote

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available | 2015 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $28,260 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 10 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 500 kg | 18.1 kg |
| AMR Subtype | goods to person | goods to person |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 195 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | other | other |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $28,260 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | P-series goods-to-person | Picker Robots |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $28,260 | No price |
| Payback period | 6.8 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $221,740 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +785% | — |
Picker Robots has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes P-series goods-to-person and Picker Robots?
P-series goods-to-person is made by Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Picker Robots is made by inVia Robotics, based in US.
When were P-series goods-to-person and Picker Robots launched?
P-series goods-to-person launched in 2015. Picker Robots launched in 2015.
How do P-series goods-to-person and Picker Robots compare on the Robo Index?
P-series goods-to-person grades AA on the Robo Index. Picker Robots grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are P-series goods-to-person and Picker Robots in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between P-series goods-to-person and Picker Robots?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
P-series goods-to-person vs Picker Robots compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.