P-series goods-to-person vs TIAGo OMNI Base
Side-by-side comparison of P-series goods-to-person (Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.) and TIAGo OMNI Base (PAL Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- P-series goods-to-personChina

- TIAGo OMNI BaseSpain

Year First Available
- P-series goods-to-person2015

- TIAGo OMNI Base—

Verified Deployments
- P-series goods-to-person0 Deployments

- TIAGo OMNI Base0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- P-series goods-to-person$28,260 USD

- TIAGo OMNI BaseContact for quote

Battery / Shift Runtime
- P-series goods-to-person—

- TIAGo OMNI Base8 hrs

Availability Status
- P-series goods-to-personACTIVE

- TIAGo OMNI BaseACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- P-series goods-to-person500 kg

- TIAGo OMNI Base150 kg

AMR Subtype
- P-series goods-to-persongoods to person

- TIAGo OMNI Baseunit load carrier

Robot Weight
- P-series goods-to-person195 kg

- TIAGo OMNI Base48 kg

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- P-series goods-to-personother

- TIAGo OMNI Baseslam natural

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- P-series goods-to-personother

- TIAGo OMNI Baseli ion

Battery Capacity
- P-series goods-to-person—

- TIAGo OMNI Base1.4 kWh

Commercial
Price (USD)
- P-series goods-to-person$28,260 USD

- TIAGo OMNI BaseContact for quote

![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $28,260 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 500 kg | 150 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | goods to person | unit load carrier |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 195 kg | 48 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | slam natural |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.4 kWh |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $28,260 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | P-series goods-to-person | TIAGo OMNI Base |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $28,260 | No price |
| Payback period | 6.8 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $221,740 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +785% | — |
TIAGo OMNI Base has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes P-series goods-to-person and TIAGo OMNI Base?
P-series goods-to-person is made by Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. TIAGo OMNI Base is made by PAL Robotics, based in ES.
How do P-series goods-to-person and TIAGo OMNI Base compare on the Robo Index?
P-series goods-to-person grades AA on the Robo Index. TIAGo OMNI Base grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are P-series goods-to-person and TIAGo OMNI Base in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between P-series goods-to-person and TIAGo OMNI Base?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
P-series goods-to-person vs TIAGo OMNI Base compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.