Geminoid DK vs Mercury
Side-by-side comparison of Geminoid DK (Kokoro, Ishiguro Lab, ATR, Aalborg University) and Mercury (Apptronik, Inc.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
Year First Available
Verified Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
Battery / Shift Runtime
Availability Status
Physical Form Factor
Height
Weight
Mobility Type
Humanoid Subtype
Walking Speed
Terrain
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
Total DOF
Arm DOF
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
Teleoperation
Programming
Battery & Power
Runtime
Software
SDK Languages
ROS Support
Open API
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
Commercial
Price (USD)
Price Tier
Pricing Model
Applications
 Geminoid DKhumanoidKokoro, Ishiguro Lab, ATR, Aalborg University46.5Trust Score | MercuryhumanoidApptronik, Inc. 51.5Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | US |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2011 | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $165,000 | $150,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 130 mm | 1180 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 40 kg | 55 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | static | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | anthropomorphic torso | — |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | — | 1.2 m/s |
| Terrain | indoor | indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 1 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 12 | 19 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 17 |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | Custom server and control infrastructure | Jetson Orin Nano SUPER 8GB |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | none | — |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation | code_python, code_cpp, no_code_gui |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | teleoperation | code_python, code_cpp, no_code_gui |
| ROS Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Open API (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $165,000 | $150,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | research | research, education, service, teleoperation |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Hand DOF, Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
About this comparison
Geminoid DK vs Mercury compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.