GEN72-B vs GP25
Side-by-side comparison of GEN72-B (RealMan Robotics) and GP25 (Yaskawa) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- GEN72-BChina
- GP25Japan
Year First Available
- GEN72-B2024
- GP25—
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- GEN72-BACTIVE
- GP25ACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Reach
- GEN72-B600 mm
- GP25—
Repeatability
- GEN72-B±1 mm
- GP25±0.03 mm
Payload
- GEN72-B2 kg
- GP25—
IP Rating (Arm)
- GEN72-BIP54
- GP25—
Degrees of Freedom
- GEN72-B—
- GP256
Max TCP Speed
- GEN72-B1.9 m/s
- GP25—
Robot Weight
- GEN72-B6.6 kg
- GP25—
Performance
MTBF
- GEN72-B30,000 hrs
- GP2528 hrs
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- GEN72-B統合型
- GP25YRC1000
Teach Pendant Type
- GEN72-B—
- GP25smart pad
End-Effector
Internal Cable Routing
- GEN72-B—
- GP25through arm and wrist
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 600 mm | — |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±1 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 2 kg | — |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | IP54 | — |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 6.6 kg | — |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | 30,000 hrs | 28 hrs |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | 統合型 | YRC1000 |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | smart pad |
| End-Effector | ||
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm and wrist |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Duty Cycle, Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Flange Standard, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Service Network, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | GEN72-B | GP25 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
GEN72-B, GP25 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes GEN72-B and GP25?
GEN72-B is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN. GP25 is made by Yaskawa, based in JP.
How do GEN72-B and GP25 compare on the Robo Score?
GEN72-B scores 72.2 on the Robo Score. GP25 scores 64.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are GEN72-B and GP25 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between GEN72-B and GP25?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
GEN72-B vs GP25 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.