GEN72-B vs Smart Slider- Website
Side-by-side comparison of GEN72-B (RealMan Robotics) and Smart Slider- Website (Nachi Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- GEN72-BChina
- Smart Slider- Website—
Year First Available
- GEN72-B2024
- Smart Slider- Website—
Verified Deployments
- GEN72-B0 Deployments
- Smart Slider- Website0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- GEN72-BACTIVE
- Smart Slider- WebsiteACTIVE
Arm Mechanics
Payload
- GEN72-B2 kg
- Smart Slider- Website500 kg
Reach
- GEN72-B600 mm
- Smart Slider- Website3,756 mm
Degrees of Freedom
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- Website7
Repeatability
- GEN72-B±1 mm
- Smart Slider- Website±0.07 mm
Max TCP Speed
- GEN72-B1.9 m/s
- Smart Slider- Website—
Robot Weight
- GEN72-B6.6 kg
- Smart Slider- Website1,620 kg
IP Rating (Arm)
- GEN72-BIP54
- Smart Slider- WebsiteIP67
Performance
MTBF
- GEN72-B30,000 hrs
- Smart Slider- Website—
Duty Cycle
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- Websitecontinuous 24 7
Controller & Programming
Controller Model
- GEN72-B統合型
- Smart Slider- WebsiteFD11
Teach Pendant Type
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- Websitewired touch
End-Effector
Tool Flange Standard
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- WebsiteISO 9409-1
Internal Cable Routing
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- Websitethrough arm and wrist
Commercial
Service Network
- GEN72-B—
- Smart Slider- Websiteglobal
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2024 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | 500 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 600 mm | 3,756 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±1 mm | ±0.07 mm |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 1.9 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 6.6 kg | 1,620 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | IP54 | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (values differ) | 30,000 hrs | — |
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | — | continuous 24 7 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | 統合型 | FD11 |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired touch |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | — | through arm and wrist |
| Commercial | ||
| Service Network (values differ) | — | global |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, IP Rating (Wrist), Cycle Time (25/305/25), Vibration Damping, Safety Category, Dual Check Safety, Safety I/O Pairs, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Programming Languages, Offline Programming, Digital Twin Support, Communication Protocols, ROS-Industrial Support, IoT / Cloud Platform, Cybersecurity Certs, Predictive Maintenance, Tool Changer (ISO), Pneumatic Lines, Electrical Lines, Price (USD), Warranty, Spare Parts Lead Time, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | GEN72-B | Smart Slider- Website |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
GEN72-B, Smart Slider- Website have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes GEN72-B and Smart Slider- Website?
GEN72-B is made by RealMan Robotics, based in CN. Smart Slider- Website is made by Nachi Robotics.
How do GEN72-B and Smart Slider- Website compare on the Robo Score?
GEN72-B scores 72.2 on the Robo Score. Smart Slider- Website scores 57.5. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are GEN72-B and Smart Slider- Website in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Industrial Arm robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between GEN72-B and Smart Slider- Website?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
GEN72-B vs Smart Slider- Website compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.