GR-3 vs Potaro
Side-by-side comparison of GR-3 (Fourier) and Potaro (Toyota Motor Corporation) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 GR-3humanoidFourier55.8Trust Score |  PotarohumanoidToyota Motor Corporation27.9Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | CN | JP |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2023 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $119,995 | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 165 mm | 1984 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 71 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | service humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 1.4 m/s | — |
| Running Capable (values differ) | run capable | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 44 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | — |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 12 | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS | General server with two GPUs |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | full_body_suit | — |
| Programming (values differ) | lead-through programming, direct command | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Avg Power Consumption (values differ) | — | 1,500 W |
| Safety | ||
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | vision human |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | lead-through programming, direct command | — |
| ROS Support (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Open API (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production scale | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $119,995 | Contact for quote |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 150K+ | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | capex | — |
| Production Pilots (values differ) | — | Toyota Memorial Hospital |
| Applications (values differ) | eldercare_assistance, hospitality | hospitality |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Stair Climbing, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
GR-3 vs Potaro compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.