Side-by-side comparison of GuRoo (University of Queensland) and MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country
GuRoo—Year First Available
GuRoo2001Verified Deployments
GuRoo0 DeploymentsBattery / Shift Runtime
GuRoo—Availability Status
GuRooACTIVEHeight
GuRoo1200 mmWeight
GuRoo38 kgMobility Type
GuRoo—Humanoid Subtype
GuRoobipedalTerrain
GuRooindoorPayload
GuRoo—Payload (Peak)
GuRoo—Total DOF
GuRoo23Arm DOF
GuRoo3Arm Reach
GuRoo—Onboard Compute
GuRooVIA C3 1.2 GHzCompute Platform
GuRoo—VLM Capable
GuRoo—Imitation Learning
GuRoo—Teleoperation
GuRoo—Programming
GuRoo—Runtime
GuRoo—Charging Method
GuRoo—Battery Swap
GuRoo—Fall Recovery
GuRoo—Human Detection Method
GuRoo—SDK Languages
GuRoo—Open API
GuRoo—Deployment Maturity
GuRoo—Applications
GuRooresearch GuRoohumanoidUniversity of Queensland27.9Trust Score | MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2001 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 1200 mm | 136.9 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 38 kg | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | — | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | bipedal | full bipedal |
| Terrain (values differ) | indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 2 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | — | 3 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 23 | 24 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 3 | 5 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 50 cm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | VIA C3 1.2 GHz | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | 8-core high-performance CPU |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | — | onboard small |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | — | multi task |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | — | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 2 hrs |
| Charging Method (values differ) | — | manual swap |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | — | multi modal |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | — | code_python, teleoperation |
| Open API (values differ) | — | limited rest |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | — | beta pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research | research |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
GuRoo vs MagicBot Z1 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.