HaiPick A42 vs T3
Side-by-side comparison of HaiPick A42 (Shenzhen Hairou Innovation Technology Co., Ltd.) and T3 (Aethon) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HaiPick A42China
- T3United States
Year First Available
- HaiPick A42—
- T32015
Verified Deployments
- HaiPick A420 Deployments
- T30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- HaiPick A42$48,000 USD
- T3Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HaiPick A426.5 hrs
- T3—
Availability Status
- HaiPick A42ACTIVE
- T3ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- HaiPick A42300 kg
- T3453.6 kg
AMR Subtype
- HaiPick A42goods to person
- T3tugger tractor
Min Aisle Width
- HaiPick A4230 mm
- T3—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- HaiPick A42other
- T3hybrid
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- HaiPick A42other
- T3li ion
Auto Docking
- HaiPick A42Yes
- T3—
Safety
Emergency Stops
- HaiPick A421
- T3—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- HaiPick A42$48,000 USD
- T3Contact for quote
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $48,000 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 6.5 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 300 kg | 453.6 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | goods to person | tugger tractor |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | 30 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | hybrid |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | li ion |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 1 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $48,000 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HaiPick A42 | T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $48,000 | No price |
| Payback period | 11.5 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $202,000 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +421% | — |
T3 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HaiPick A42 and T3?
HaiPick A42 is made by Shenzhen Hairou Innovation Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. T3 is made by Aethon, based in US.
How do HaiPick A42 and T3 compare on the Robo Index?
HaiPick A42 grades BBB on the Robo Index. T3 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are HaiPick A42 and T3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HaiPick A42 and T3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HaiPick A42 vs T3 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.