HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ vs TRACKHOLD
Side-by-side comparison of HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ (Cyberdyne) and TRACKHOLD (Wearable Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Home & Household buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプJapan
- TRACKHOLDItaly
Year First Available
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2015
- TRACKHOLD2015
Verified Deployments
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ0 Deployments
- TRACKHOLD0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2 hrs
- TRACKHOLD720 hrs
Availability Status
- HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプACTIVE
- TRACKHOLDACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Japan | Italy |
| Year First Available | 2015 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Home & Household buyers) (values differ) | 2 hrs | 720 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Payload Capacity, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ | TRACKHOLD |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ, TRACKHOLD have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and TRACKHOLD?
HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. TRACKHOLD is made by Wearable Robotics, based in IT.
When were HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and TRACKHOLD launched?
HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ launched in 2015. TRACKHOLD launched in 2015.
How do HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and TRACKHOLD compare on the Robo Score?
HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ scores 62.1 on the Robo Score. TRACKHOLD scores 52.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and TRACKHOLD in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and TRACKHOLD?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ vs TRACKHOLD compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.