Skip to content

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ vs X-ble Shoulder

Side-by-side comparison of HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ (Cyberdyne) and X-ble Shoulder (Hyundai Motor Group) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプJapan
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble ShoulderSouth Korea

Year First Available

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2015
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble Shoulder2024

Verified Deployments

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ0 Deployments
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble Shoulder0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Battery / Shift Runtime

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ2 hrs
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble Shoulder

Availability Status

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプACTIVE
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble ShoulderACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Payload Capacity

  • HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
    HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ
  • X-ble Shoulder
    X-ble Shoulder3.7 kg

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricHAL®自立支援用単関節タイプX-ble Shoulder
InvestmentNo priceNo price
Payback period
Net savings (5 yr)
ROI (5 yr)

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ, X-ble Shoulder have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and X-ble Shoulder?

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. X-ble Shoulder is made by Hyundai Motor Group, based in KR.

When were HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and X-ble Shoulder launched?

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ launched in 2015. X-ble Shoulder launched in 2024.

How do HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and X-ble Shoulder compare on the Robo Score?

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ scores 62.1 on the Robo Score. X-ble Shoulder scores 64.8. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and X-ble Shoulder in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ and X-ble Shoulder?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

HAL®自立支援用単関節タイプ vs X-ble Shoulder compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.