Side-by-side comparison of HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 (Cyberdyne) and HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Payload Capacity


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | Japan | Japan |
| Year First Available | 2022 | 2022 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 4.5 hrs | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 100 kg |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 | HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用, HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Frequently asked
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 launched in 2022. HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro launched in 2022.
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 grades A on the Robo Index. HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
HAL®腰タイプ自立支援用 vs HAL®自立支援用下肢タイプ Pro compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.