Skip to content
Claim

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP vs Trexo Plus

Side-by-side comparison of HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP (Cyberdyne) and Trexo Plus (Trexo Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.

Prices in
View saved

Optimize comparison for buyer

DefaultHospitality & F&BWarehousing & LogisticsManufacturingHealthcare & HospitalsCleaning & FacilitiesLast-Mile DeliveryAgricultureHome & Household

Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP62.1
Trexo Plus
Trexo Plus61.3

Layer 1: Identity & Trust

Manufacturer Country

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPJapan
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo PlusCanada

Year First Available

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP2018
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo Plus2018

Verified Deployments

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP0 Deployments
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo Plus0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational

Battery / Shift Runtime

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP1 hrs
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo Plus—

Availability Status

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJPACTIVE
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo PlusACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific

Payload Capacity

  • HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP
    HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP100 kg
  • Trexo Plus
    Trexo Plus—

Insufficient data for full comparison

The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level

best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ

ROI Comparison

Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.

Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000

MetricHAL®医療用下肢タイプJPTrexo Plus
InvestmentNo priceNo price
Payback period——
Net savings (5 yr)——
ROI (5 yr)——

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP, Trexo Plus have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.

Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.

Trade-offs at a glance

Frequently asked

Who makes HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Trexo Plus?

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP. Trexo Plus is made by Trexo Robotics, based in CA.

When were HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Trexo Plus launched?

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP launched in 2018. Trexo Plus launched in 2018.

How do HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Trexo Plus compare on the Robo Score?

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP scores 62.1 on the Robo Score. Trexo Plus scores 61.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.

Are HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Trexo Plus in the same category?

Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.

What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?

Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.

What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP and Trexo Plus?

Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.

Going deeper — picking the right robot

Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.

Get updates:

Other comparisons

About this comparison

HAL®医療用下肢タイプJP vs Trexo Plus compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.