Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 vs LY-3-100T-612-B
Side-by-side comparison of Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) and LY-3-100T-612-B (Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0China
- LY-3-100T-612-BChina
Year First Available
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.02025
- LY-3-100T-612-B2008
Verified Deployments
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.00 Deployments
- LY-3-100T-612-B0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0Contact for quote
- LY-3-100T-612-B$4,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.06 hrs
- LY-3-100T-612-B6 hrs
Availability Status
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0ACTIVE
- LY-3-100T-612-BACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.01,200 kg
- LY-3-100T-612-B3,000 kg
Max Speed
- Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.01.5 m/s
- LY-3-100T-612-B0.4 m/s
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $4,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) | 6 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 1,200 kg | 3,000 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 1.5 m/s | 0.4 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 | LY-3-100T-612-B |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $4,000 |
| Payback period | — | < 1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $246,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +6150% |
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B?
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. LY-3-100T-612-B is made by Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd, based in CN.
When were Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B launched?
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 launched in 2025. LY-3-100T-612-B launched in 2008.
How do Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B compare on the Robo Index?
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 grades BBB on the Robo Index. LY-3-100T-612-B grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
What is the payload difference between Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B?
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 carries up to 1200 kg. LY-3-100T-612-B carries up to 3000 kg.
Are Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 and LY-3-100T-612-B?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Hammer Counterbalanced Autonomous Forklift 2.0 vs LY-3-100T-612-B compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.