HG-108 vs LY-3-100T-612-B
Side-by-side comparison of HG-108 (Huahang Transportation Equipment Technology (shenzhen) Co., Ltd.) and LY-3-100T-612-B (Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- HG-108China
- LY-3-100T-612-BChina
Year First Available
- HG-108—
- LY-3-100T-612-B2008
Verified Deployments
- HG-1080 Deployments
- LY-3-100T-612-B0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- HG-108$7,000 USD
- LY-3-100T-612-B$4,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- HG-108—
- LY-3-100T-612-B6 hrs
Availability Status
- HG-108ACTIVE
- LY-3-100T-612-BACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- HG-108—
- LY-3-100T-612-B3,000 kg
Max Speed
- HG-1080.3 m/s
- LY-3-100T-612-B0.4 m/s
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2008 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $7,000 USD | $4,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | — | 3,000 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.3 m/s | 0.4 m/s |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | HG-108 | LY-3-100T-612-B |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $7,000 | $4,000 |
| Payback period | 1.7 mo | < 1 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $243,000 | $246,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +3471% | +6150% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes HG-108 and LY-3-100T-612-B?
HG-108 is made by Huahang Transportation Equipment Technology (shenzhen) Co., Ltd., based in CN. LY-3-100T-612-B is made by Lonyu Agv Co., Ltd, based in CN.
How do HG-108 and LY-3-100T-612-B compare on the Robo Score?
HG-108 scores 50.3 on the Robo Score. LY-3-100T-612-B scores 59.6. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are HG-108 and LY-3-100T-612-B in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agv on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Agv robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Agv TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between HG-108 and LY-3-100T-612-B?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AGV TCO: hardware, infrastructure, and maintenance
10 min readAGVs
AGV RFP red flags: avoiding vendor lock-in
10 min readAGVs
Running an AGV pilot: what should pass and what should fail it
9 min readAGVs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
HG-108 vs LY-3-100T-612-B compares two robots in the agv category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.