Keenon XMAN R1 vs PUDU D9
Side-by-side comparison of Keenon XMAN R1 (KEENON) and PUDU D9 (Shenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
 Keenon XMAN R1humanoidKEENON56.5Trust Score |  PUDU D9humanoidShenzhen Pudu Technology Co., Ltd.49.6Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $60,000–$100,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Weight (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 110 kg | 65 kg |
| Height (values differ) | 172 mm | 170 mm |
| Mobility Type | bipedal | bipedal |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | service humanoid | full bipedal |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.8 m/s | 2 m/s |
| Stair Climbing (values differ) | — | production ready |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor, mild_incline, rough_indoor, outdoor_unstructured |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 3 kg | 20 kg |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 36 | 42 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | — | 7 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 10 | 12 |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | — | 58 cm |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | — | 275 TOPS |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 3 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.7 kWh |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | production pilot | — |
| IP Rating (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $100,000 | $60,000–$100,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | 80-150K | — |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | purchase | — |
| Applications (values differ) | hospitality, logistics, property operations | warehouse_transport, hospitality, healthcare |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Running Capable, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Compute Platform, VLM Capable, Foundation Models, Imitation Learning, Teleoperation, Programming, Charging Time, Charging Method, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Recovery, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Human Detection Method, Safe Speed Near Humans, SDK Languages, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Open API, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
Keenon XMAN R1 vs PUDU D9 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.