KLEENBOT C40 vs Whiz
Side-by-side comparison of KLEENBOT C40 (Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd.) and Whiz (SoftBank Robotics) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- KLEENBOT C40China
- WhizUnited States
Year First Available
- KLEENBOT C40—
- Whiz2019
Verified Deployments
- KLEENBOT C400 Deployments
- Whiz0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- KLEENBOT C40$18,000–$19,600 USD
- WhizUp to $27,400 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- KLEENBOT C40—
- Whiz3 hrs
Availability Status
- KLEENBOT C40ACTIVE
- WhizACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Max Speed
- KLEENBOT C40—
- Whiz0.5 m/s
Autonomy Level
- KLEENBOT C40—
- Whizfully autonomous
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2019 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $18,000–$19,600 USD | Up to $27,400 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | — | 3 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 0.5 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | KLEENBOT C40 | Whiz |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $18,800 | $27,400 |
| Payback period | 4.5 mo | 6.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $231,200 | $222,600 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +1230% | +812% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes KLEENBOT C40 and Whiz?
KLEENBOT C40 is made by Shanghai Keenon Robotics Co., Ltd., based in CN. Whiz is made by SoftBank Robotics, based in US.
How do KLEENBOT C40 and Whiz compare on the Robo Index?
KLEENBOT C40 grades A on the Robo Index. Whiz grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are KLEENBOT C40 and Whiz in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Cleaning on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Cleaning robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Cleaning TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between KLEENBOT C40 and Whiz?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time
8 min readCleaning Robots
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
10 min readCleaning Robots
Operator training: the line item most facilities skip
9 min readCleaning Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
KLEENBOT C40 vs Whiz compares two robots in the cleaning category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.