Side-by-side comparison of KR 70 R2100 HO (KUKA Robotics) and LR Mate 200iD (FANUC) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Payload


Reach


Degrees of Freedom


Repeatability


Robot Weight


IP Rating (Arm)


IP Rating (Wrist)


MTBF


Cycle Time (25/305/25)


Duty Cycle


Vibration Damping


Safety Category


Dual Check Safety


Safety I/O Pairs


E-Stop Response


Safe Zone Count


Controller Model


Programming Languages


Teach Pendant Type


Offline Programming


Digital Twin Support


ROS-Industrial Support


IoT / Cloud Platform


Predictive Maintenance


Tool Flange Standard


Tool Changer (ISO)


Internal Cable Routing


Pneumatic Lines


Electrical Lines


Price (USD)


Warranty


Service Network


Spare Parts Lead Time


Expected Service Life


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Germany | Japan |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $52,000 USD | $18,000–$25,000 USD |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 70 kg | 7 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | 2,101 mm | 717 mm |
| Degrees of Freedom | 6 | 6 |
| Repeatability (values differ) | ±0.05 mm | ±0.01 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 536 kg | 20 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (values differ) | IP65 | IP67 |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | IP65/IP67 | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| MTBF (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 50,000 hrs |
| Cycle Time (25/305/25) (values differ) | — | 0.4 s |
| Duty Cycle | continuous 24 7 | continuous 24 7 |
| Vibration Damping (values differ) | — | active model based |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Dual Check Safety | Yes | Yes |
| Safety I/O Pairs (values differ) | — | 6 |
| E-Stop Response (values differ) | — | 100 ms |
| Safe Zone Count (values differ) | — | 4 |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | KR C5; KR C4 | R-30iB Plus |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | KRL | TP/KAREL, RAPID |
| Teach Pendant Type | wired touch | wired touch |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | KUKA.Sim | ROBOGUIDE |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | community | vendor supported |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | KUKA Connect | FANUC ZDT |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | threshold based | ml based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard | ISO 9409-1 | ISO 9409-1 |
| Tool Changer (ISO) (values differ) | Stäubli | ATI |
| Internal Cable Routing | through arm and wrist | through arm and wrist |
| Pneumatic Lines (values differ) | — | 2 |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | — | 20 |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $52,000 USD | $18,000–$25,000 USD |
| Warranty | 1 yrs | 1 yrs |
| Service Network | global | global |
| Spare Parts Lead Time (values differ) | — | 5 days |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | — | 10 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Max TCP Speed, Communication Protocols, Cybersecurity Certs
Frequently asked
KR 70 R2100 HO is made by KUKA Robotics, based in DE. LR Mate 200iD is made by FANUC, based in JP.
KR 70 R2100 HO scores 92/100. LR Mate 200iD scores 92/100. The Robo Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
KR 70 R2100 HO has a reach of 2101 mm. LR Mate 200iD has a reach of 717 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
KR 70 R2100 HO vs LR Mate 200iD compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.