Laevo V2 vs Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type
Side-by-side comparison of Laevo V2 (Laevo) and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type (Cyberdyne) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Laevo V2Netherlands
- Well-Being HAL Lower Limb TypeJapan
Year First Available
- Laevo V22015
- Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type2022
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Laevo V2—
- Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type1 hrs
Availability Status
- Laevo V2ACTIVE
- Well-Being HAL Lower Limb TypeACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- Laevo V2—
- Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type100 kg
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Netherlands | Japan |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2015 | 2022 |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 1 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (values differ) | — | 100 kg |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Verified Deployments, Price, Reach, Max Speed, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | Laevo V2 | Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
Laevo V2, Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Laevo V2 and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type?
Laevo V2 is made by Laevo, based in NL. Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type is made by Cyberdyne, based in JP.
When were Laevo V2 and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type launched?
Laevo V2 launched in 2015. Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type launched in 2022.
How do Laevo V2 and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type compare on the Robo Score?
Laevo V2 scores 53.3 on the Robo Score. Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type scores 61.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Laevo V2 and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Exoskeleton on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Exoskeleton robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Exoskeleton TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Laevo V2 and Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
The real cost and payback of an industrial exoskeleton program
7 min readExoskeletons
The exoskeleton vendor RFP: questions and red flags
8 min readExoskeletons
A 90-day deployment playbook for industrial exoskeleton programs
9 min readExoskeletons
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
Laevo V2 vs Well-Being HAL Lower Limb Type compares two robots in the exoskeleton category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.