LaserWeeder G2 vs OZ
Side-by-side comparison of LaserWeeder G2 (Carbon Robotics) and OZ (Naïo Technologies SAS) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- LaserWeeder G2United States
- OZFrance

Year First Available
- LaserWeeder G22025
- OZ2011

Verified Deployments
- LaserWeeder G20 Deployments
- OZ0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- LaserWeeder G2$1,200,000 USD
- OZ$38,360–$43,280 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime
- LaserWeeder G2—
- OZ8 hrs

Availability Status
- LaserWeeder G2ACTIVE
- OZACTIVE

Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- LaserWeeder G2—
- OZ700 kg

Max Speed
- LaserWeeder G2—
- OZ0.4 m/s

Autonomy Level
- LaserWeeder G2—
- OZfully autonomous

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | France |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2025 | 2011 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $1,200,000 USD | $38,360–$43,280 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 700 kg |
| Max Speed (values differ) | — | 0.4 m/s |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | — | fully autonomous |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Reach, IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | LaserWeeder G2 | OZ |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $1,200,000 | $40,820 |
| Payback period | 288.0 mo | 9.8 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | -$950,000 | $209,180 |
| ROI (5 yr) | -79% | +512% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes LaserWeeder G2 and OZ?
LaserWeeder G2 is made by Carbon Robotics, based in US. OZ is made by Naïo Technologies SAS, based in FR.
When were LaserWeeder G2 and OZ launched?
LaserWeeder G2 launched in 2025. OZ launched in 2011.
How do LaserWeeder G2 and OZ compare on the Robo Index?
LaserWeeder G2 grades BB on the Robo Index. OZ grades AAA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are LaserWeeder G2 and OZ in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agricultural on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between LaserWeeder G2 and OZ?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms
10 min readAgricultural Robots
From Research Plot to Commercial Scale: A Two-Season Playbook
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Field Constraints That Kill Robot Deployments: Terrain, Weather, Crop Spacing
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
LaserWeeder G2 vs OZ compares two robots in the agricultural category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.