LYNX M20 vs MiR500
Side-by-side comparison of LYNX M20 (Mobilio Robotics) and MiR500 (MiR) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Denmark
Year First Available
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5002018
Verified Deployments
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5001 Deployment
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- LYNX M20$209 USD
- MiR500Contact for quote
Battery / Shift Runtime
- LYNX M202.5 hrs
- MiR50017.5 hrs
Availability Status
- LYNX M20ACTIVE
- MiR500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500500 kg
AMR Subtype
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500unit load carrier
Length
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500800 mm
Width
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500580 mm
Min Aisle Width
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500850 mm
Ground Clearance
- LYNX M20—
- MiR50025 mm
Robot Weight
- LYNX M20—
- MiR50094 kg
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500other
Localization Accuracy
- LYNX M20—
- MiR50060 mm
Docking Repeatability
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5003 mm
Obstacle Detection Range
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5001.2 m
Min Object Detection Height
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5009.8 cm
Pedestrian Detection
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Yes
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500li ion
Runtime (Loaded)
- LYNX M20—
- MiR50013 hrs
Opportunity Charging
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Yes
Auto Docking
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Yes
Charge Cycles (Rated)
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5003000
Safety
ISO 3691-4 Certified
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Yes
R15.08 Certified
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500Yes
Emergency Stops
- LYNX M20—
- MiR5001
Safety LiDAR Coverage
- LYNX M20—
- MiR500360 °
Commercial
Price (USD)
- LYNX M20$209 USD
- MiR500Contact for quote
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | — | Denmark |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2018 |
| Verified Deployments (values differ) | — | 1 Deployment |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $209 USD | Contact for quote |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2.5 hrs | 17.5 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | — | 500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | — | unit load carrier |
| Length (values differ) | — | 800 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 580 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 25 mm |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | — | 94 kg |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | — | other |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 60 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 3 mm |
| Obstacle Detection Range (values differ) | — | 1.2 m |
| Min Object Detection Height (values differ) | — | 9.8 cm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | — | li ion |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 13 hrs |
| Opportunity Charging (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Charge Cycles (Rated) (values differ) | — | 3000 |
| Safety | ||
| ISO 3691-4 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| R15.08 Certified (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Safety LiDAR Coverage (values differ) | — | 360 ° |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $209 USD | Contact for quote |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Safety Category, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | LYNX M20 | MiR500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $209 | No price |
| Payback period | < 1 mo | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $249,791 | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | +119517% | — |
MiR500 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes LYNX M20 and MiR500?
LYNX M20 is made by Mobilio Robotics. MiR500 is made by MiR, based in DK.
Are LYNX M20 and MiR500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between LYNX M20 and MiR500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
LYNX M20 vs MiR500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.