M-100 vs T3
Side-by-side comparison of M-100 (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and T3 (Aethon) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- M-100China
- T3United States
Year First Available
- M-100—
- T32015
Verified Deployments
- M-1000 Deployments
- T30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- M-10012 hrs
- T3—
Availability Status
- M-100ACTIVE
- T3ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- M-1001,000 kg
- T3453.6 kg
AMR Subtype
- M-100unit load carrier
- T3tugger tractor
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- M-100qr marker
- T3hybrid
Localization Accuracy
- M-10010 mm
- T3—
Performance
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- M-1004.5 m/s
- T3—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- M-100li ion
- T3li ion
Commercial
RaaS / Month
- M-100$26
- T3—
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 12 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 1,000 kg | 453.6 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | tugger tractor |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | qr marker | hybrid |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | 10 mm | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 4.5 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | li ion | li ion |
| Commercial | ||
| RaaS / Month (values differ) | $26 | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | M-100 | T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
M-100, T3 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes M-100 and T3?
M-100 is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. T3 is made by Aethon, based in US.
How do M-100 and T3 compare on the Robo Index?
M-100 grades A on the Robo Index. T3 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are M-100 and T3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between M-100 and T3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
M-100 vs T3 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.