MagicBot Z1 vs Walker S2
Side-by-side comparison of MagicBot Z1 (Magiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.) and Walker S2 (Zhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Trust Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MagicBot Z1CN
Walker S2CN
Year First Available
- MagicBot Z1—
- Walker S22024
Verified Deployments
- MagicBot Z10 Deployments
- Walker S20 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
- Walker S2—
Availability Status
- MagicBot Z1ACTIVE
- Walker S2ACTIVE
Physical Form Factor
Height
- MagicBot Z1136.9 mm
- Walker S2—
Mobility Type
- MagicBot Z1bipedal
- Walker S2—
Humanoid Subtype
- MagicBot Z1full bipedal
- Walker S2—
Terrain
- MagicBot Z1flat_indoor
- Walker S2—
Payload & Dexterity
Payload
- MagicBot Z12 kg
- Walker S2—
Payload (Peak)
- MagicBot Z13 kg
- Walker S2—
Total DOF
- MagicBot Z124
- Walker S2—
Arm DOF
- MagicBot Z15
- Walker S2—
Arm Reach
- MagicBot Z150 cm
- Walker S2—
Compute & AI
Onboard Compute
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
- Walker S2—
Compute Platform
- MagicBot Z18-core high-performance CPU
- Walker S2—
VLM Capable
- MagicBot Z1onboard small
- Walker S2—
Imitation Learning
- MagicBot Z1multi task
- Walker S2—
Teleoperation
- MagicBot Z1joystick
- Walker S2—
Programming
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
- Walker S2—
Battery & Power
Runtime
- MagicBot Z12 hrs
- Walker S2—
Charging Method
- MagicBot Z1manual swap
- Walker S2—
Battery Swap
- MagicBot Z1Yes
- Walker S2—
Safety
Fall Recovery
- MagicBot Z1Yes
- Walker S2—
Human Detection Method
- MagicBot Z1multi modal
- Walker S2—
Software
SDK Languages
- MagicBot Z1code_python, teleoperation
- Walker S2—
Open API
- MagicBot Z1limited rest
- Walker S2—
Reliability
Deployment Maturity
- MagicBot Z1beta pilot
- Walker S2—
Commercial
Applications
- MagicBot Z1research
- Walker S2—
| MagicBot Z1humanoidMagiclab Robotics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd. 22.3Trust Score | Walker S2humanoidZhengzhou Hento Machinery Co., Ltd. —Trust Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | CN | CN |
| Year First Available (values differ) | — | 2024 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 136.9 mm | — |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | — |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | — |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | — |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 2 kg | — |
| Payload (Peak) (values differ) | 3 kg | — |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 24 | — |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 5 | — |
| Arm Reach (values differ) | 50 cm | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | 8-core high-performance CPU | — |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | 8-core high-performance CPU | — |
| VLM Capable (values differ) | onboard small | — |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | multi task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | joystick | — |
| Programming (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | — |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | 2 hrs | — |
| Charging Method (values differ) | manual swap | — |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Safety | ||
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | multi modal | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | code_python, teleoperation | — |
| Open API (values differ) | limited rest | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | beta pilot | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Applications (values differ) | research | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price Range (USD), Weight, Walking Speed, Running Capable, Stair Climbing, Hand DOF, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Bimanual Coordination, Tool Use, Foundation Models, Battery Capacity, Charging Time, Avg Power Consumption, Force-Limited Arms, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, Safe Speed Near Humans, ROS Support, Simulation Platforms, Air-Gap Capable, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, Price (USD), Price Tier, RaaS / Month, Pricing Model, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
About this comparison
MagicBot Z1 vs Walker S2 compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Trust Score is calculated.