Mako Spine vs Virus UV
Side-by-side comparison of Mako Spine (Stryker) and Virus UV (Termway (Beijing) Precision Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- Mako SpineUnited States
- Virus UV—
Verified Deployments
- Mako Spine0 Deployments
- Virus UV0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price Range (USD)
- Mako SpineContact for quote
- Virus UV$49,999
Battery / Shift Runtime
- Mako Spine—
- Virus UV1.8 hrs
Availability Status
- Mako SpineACTIVE
- Virus UVACTIVE
Cross-Category Comparison
Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison.
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | United States | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $49,999 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 1.8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
Cross-Category Comparison Showing shared foundation fields. Select robots from the same category for full spec comparison. | ||
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Year First Available, Payload Capacity, Reach, IP Rating, Autonomy Level
best in categoryweakest in categoryvalues differ
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes Mako Spine and Virus UV?
Mako Spine is made by Stryker, based in US. Virus UV is made by Termway (Beijing) Precision Technology Co., Ltd..
How do Mako Spine and Virus UV compare on the Robolist Product Score?
Mako Spine scores 15/100. Virus UV scores 28/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are Mako Spine and Virus UV comparable?
Mako Spine is categorized as Surgical Medical; Virus UV as Cleaning. The Product Score is calculated per category, so the absolute scores reflect their respective category tiers.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Surgical Medical And Cleaning robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Surgical Medical And Cleaning TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between Mako Spine and Virus UV?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Surgical Robot TCO: Capital, Consumables, Training, and Per-Procedure Cost
8 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Surgical Robot Vendor Selection: Support Coverage, Software Upgrades, and Lifecycle
9 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Pilot to Scale: Case Volume Thresholds for Surgical Robot ROI
8 min readSurgical & Medical Robots
Cleaning robot TCO: hardware, consumables, and human-in-the-loop time
8 min readCleaning Robots
Cleaning robot vendor evaluation: SLAs, fleet management, and reporting
10 min readCleaning Robots
About this comparison
Mako Spine vs Virus UV compares two robots in the surgical-medical and cleaning categories. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.