MiR1000 vs scout 2.0
Side-by-side comparison of MiR1000 (MiR) and scout 2.0 (Agilex) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR1000Denmark
- scout 2.0China
Year First Available
- MiR10002013
- scout 2.02016
Verified Deployments
- MiR10000 Deployments
- scout 2.00 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MiR1000Contact for quote
- scout 2.0$14,190 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR1000—
- scout 2.08 hrs
Availability Status
- MiR1000ACTIVE
- scout 2.0ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR10001,000 kg
- scout 2.050 kg
AMR Subtype
- MiR1000unit load carrier
- scout 2.0other
Robot Weight
- MiR1000230 kg
- scout 2.0—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR1000other
- scout 2.0other
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR1000li ion
- scout 2.0other
Battery Capacity
- MiR10001.9 kWh
- scout 2.0—
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MiR1000Contact for quote
- scout 2.0$14,190 USD
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | 2016 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $14,190 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1,000 kg | 50 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | other |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 230 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type | other | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | other |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 1.9 kWh | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $14,190 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR1000 | scout 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $14,190 |
| Payback period | — | 3.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $235,810 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +1662% |
MiR1000 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR1000 and scout 2.0?
MiR1000 is made by MiR, based in DK. scout 2.0 is made by Agilex, based in CN.
When were MiR1000 and scout 2.0 launched?
MiR1000 launched in 2013. scout 2.0 launched in 2016.
How do MiR1000 and scout 2.0 compare on the Robo Index?
MiR1000 grades AA on the Robo Index. scout 2.0 grades A. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR1000 and scout 2.0 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR1000 and scout 2.0?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR1000 vs scout 2.0 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.