MiR200 vs Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot
Side-by-side comparison of MiR200 (MiR) and Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot (Wesar (Suzhou) Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR200Denmark
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile RobotChina
Year First Available
- MiR2002017
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot—
Verified Deployments
- MiR2000 Deployments
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR2008 hrs
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot7 hrs
Availability Status
- MiR200ACTIVE
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile RobotACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR2001,200 kg
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot—
AMR Subtype
- MiR200unit load carrier
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robotpallet mover
Length
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot780 mm
Width
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot545 mm
Turning Radius
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot820 mm
Ground Clearance
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot30 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR200slam natural
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robotqr code,lidar slam,visual slam
Localization Accuracy
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot10 mm
Pedestrian Detection
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile RobotYes
Performance
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot2 m/s
Picks / Hour / Robot
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot100
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR200li ion
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot—
Charging Time
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot1.5 hrs
Safety
Emergency Stops
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot1
Commercial
Pricing Models
- MiR200—
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robotcapex
Warranty
- MiR2002 yrs
- Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot1 yrs
Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robotamr-warehouseWesar (Suzhou) Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd 46.0Robo Score | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | 7 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 1,200 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | pallet mover |
| Length (values differ) | — | 780 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 545 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 820 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 30 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | qr code,lidar slam,visual slam |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 10 mm |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | — | 2 m/s |
| Picks / Hour / Robot (values differ) | — | 100 |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | — |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 1.5 hrs |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | — | 1 |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | capex |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Min Aisle Width, Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Max Speed (Loaded), Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR200 | Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR200, Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR200 and Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot?
MiR200 is made by MiR, based in DK. Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot is made by Wesar (Suzhou) Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd, based in CN.
How do MiR200 and Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot compare on the Robo Score?
MiR200 scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot scores 46.0. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR200 and Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR200 and Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR200 vs Q2-400 Latent Mobile Robot compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.