MiR200 vs Reeman Giraffe PRO
Side-by-side comparison of MiR200 (MiR) and Reeman Giraffe PRO (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Agriculture buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR200Denmark

- Reeman Giraffe PROChina

Year First Available
- MiR2002017

- Reeman Giraffe PRO—

Verified Deployments
- MiR2000 Deployments

- Reeman Giraffe PRO0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR2008 hrs

- Reeman Giraffe PRO8 hrs

Availability Status
- MiR200ACTIVE

- Reeman Giraffe PROACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR2001,200 kg

- Reeman Giraffe PRO—

AMR Subtype
- MiR200unit load carrier

- Reeman Giraffe PROother

Length
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO704 mm

Width
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO470 mm

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR200slam natural

- Reeman Giraffe PROlidar slam

Localization Accuracy
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO70 mm

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR200li ion

- Reeman Giraffe PROlifepo4

Battery Capacity
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO1 kWh

Runtime (Loaded)
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO8 hrs

Charging Time
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PRO7 hrs

Auto Docking
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PROYes

Commercial
Pricing Models
- MiR200—

- Reeman Giraffe PROcapex

Warranty
- MiR2002 yrs

- Reeman Giraffe PRO1 yrs

![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Agriculture buyers) | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Agriculture buyers) (values differ) | 1,200 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | other |
| Length (values differ) | — | 704 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 470 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 70 mm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | lifepo4 |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1 kWh |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | capex |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR200 | Reeman Giraffe PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR200, Reeman Giraffe PRO have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR200 and Reeman Giraffe PRO?
MiR200 is made by MiR, based in DK. Reeman Giraffe PRO is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do MiR200 and Reeman Giraffe PRO compare on the Robo Score?
MiR200 scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. Reeman Giraffe PRO scores 45.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR200 and Reeman Giraffe PRO in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR200 and Reeman Giraffe PRO?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR200 vs Reeman Giraffe PRO compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.