MiR200 vs RMR-FR31010L
Side-by-side comparison of MiR200 (MiR) and RMR-FR31010L (RuanYi Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR200Denmark
- RMR-FR31010LChina
Year First Available
- MiR2002017
- RMR-FR31010L—
Verified Deployments
- MiR2000 Deployments
- RMR-FR31010L0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- MiR200Contact for quote
- RMR-FR31010L$11,000 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR2008 hrs
- RMR-FR31010L8 hrs
Availability Status
- MiR200ACTIVE
- RMR-FR31010LACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR2001,200 kg
- RMR-FR31010L—
AMR Subtype
- MiR200unit load carrier
- RMR-FR31010L—
Length
- MiR200—
- RMR-FR31010L290 mm
Width
- MiR200—
- RMR-FR31010L196 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR200slam natural
- RMR-FR31010Llidar slam,qr code,hybrid
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR200li ion
- RMR-FR31010Llifepo4
Battery Swap
- MiR200—
- RMR-FR31010LYes
Commercial
Price (USD)
- MiR200Contact for quote
- RMR-FR31010L$11,000 USD
Warranty
- MiR2002 yrs
- RMR-FR31010L1 yrs
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2017 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $11,000 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 1,200 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | — |
| Length (values differ) | — | 290 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 196 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | lidar slam,qr code,hybrid |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | lifepo4 |
| Battery Swap (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $11,000 USD |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR200 | RMR-FR31010L |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $11,000 |
| Payback period | — | 2.6 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $239,000 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +2173% |
MiR200 has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR200 and RMR-FR31010L?
MiR200 is made by MiR, based in DK. RMR-FR31010L is made by RuanYi Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do MiR200 and RMR-FR31010L compare on the Robo Score?
MiR200 scores 72.0 on the Robo Score. RMR-FR31010L scores 53.3. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR200 and RMR-FR31010L in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR200 and RMR-FR31010L?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR200 vs RMR-FR31010L compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.