MiR100 vs QuickFork forklift AMR
Side-by-side comparison of MiR100 (MiR) and QuickFork forklift AMR (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- MiR100Denmark
- QuickFork forklift AMRChina
Year First Available
- MiR1002013
- QuickFork forklift AMR2014
Verified Deployments
- MiR1000 Deployments
- QuickFork forklift AMR0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- MiR100—
- QuickFork forklift AMR8 hrs
Availability Status
- MiR100ACTIVE
- QuickFork forklift AMRACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- MiR100100 kg
- QuickFork forklift AMR1,500 kg
AMR Subtype
- MiR100unit load carrier
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
Robot Weight
- MiR100350 kg
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- MiR100slam natural
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- MiR100li ion
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- MiR100—
- QuickFork forklift AMRWES, WCS, RCS
QuickFork forklift AMRamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 69.9Robo Score | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | Denmark | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2013 | 2014 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 100 kg | 1,500 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | unit load carrier | other |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 350 kg | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | slam natural | other |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion | other |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | — | WES, WCS, RCS |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | MiR100 | QuickFork forklift AMR |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
MiR100, QuickFork forklift AMR have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes MiR100 and QuickFork forklift AMR?
MiR100 is made by MiR, based in DK. QuickFork forklift AMR is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN.
When were MiR100 and QuickFork forklift AMR launched?
MiR100 launched in 2013. QuickFork forklift AMR launched in 2014.
How do MiR100 and QuickFork forklift AMR compare on the Robo Score?
MiR100 scores 65.0 on the Robo Score. QuickFork forklift AMR scores 69.9. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are MiR100 and QuickFork forklift AMR in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between MiR100 and QuickFork forklift AMR?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
MiR100 vs QuickFork forklift AMR compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.