OZ vs SZGH-P1950-B-6
Side-by-side comparison of OZ (Naïo Technologies SAS) and SZGH-P1950-B-6 (Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Hospitality & F&B buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- OZFrance
- SZGH-P1950-B-6China
Year First Available
- OZ2011
- SZGH-P1950-B-6—
Verified Deployments
- OZ0 Deployments
- SZGH-P1950-B-60 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Price
- OZ$38,360–$43,280 USD
- SZGH-P1950-B-6$3,888–$7,610 USD
Battery / Shift Runtime
- OZ8 hrs
- SZGH-P1950-B-6—
Availability Status
- OZACTIVE
- SZGH-P1950-B-6ACTIVE
Layer 3: Category Specific
Payload Capacity
- OZ700 kg
- SZGH-P1950-B-66 kg
Reach
- OZ—
- SZGH-P1950-B-61,950 mm
Max Speed
- OZ0.4 m/s
- SZGH-P1950-B-6—
Autonomy Level
- OZfully autonomous
- SZGH-P1950-B-6—
| | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | France | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2011 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | $38,360–$43,280 USD | $3,888–$7,610 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 8 hrs | — |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload Capacity (priority for Hospitality & F&B buyers) (values differ) | 700 kg | 6 kg |
| Reach (values differ) | — | 1,950 mm |
| Max Speed (values differ) | 0.4 m/s | — |
| Autonomy Level (values differ) | fully autonomous | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: IP Rating
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | OZ | SZGH-P1950-B-6 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | $40,820 | $5,749 |
| Payback period | 9.8 mo | 1.4 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | $209,180 | $244,251 |
| ROI (5 yr) | +512% | +4249% |
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes OZ and SZGH-P1950-B-6?
OZ is made by Naïo Technologies SAS, based in FR. SZGH-P1950-B-6 is made by Shenzhen Guanhong Automation Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do OZ and SZGH-P1950-B-6 compare on the Robo Score?
OZ scores 58.6 on the Robo Score. SZGH-P1950-B-6 scores 53.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are OZ and SZGH-P1950-B-6 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Agricultural on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between OZ and SZGH-P1950-B-6?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Ag Robot Vendor Selection: Pilot Data, Financing Options, and Exit Terms
10 min readAgricultural Robots
From Research Plot to Commercial Scale: A Two-Season Playbook
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Field Constraints That Kill Robot Deployments: Terrain, Weather, Crop Spacing
9 min readAgricultural Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
OZ vs SZGH-P1950-B-6 compares two robots in the agricultural category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.