QuickFork forklift AMR vs Reeman Giraffe PRO
Side-by-side comparison of QuickFork forklift AMR (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and Reeman Giraffe PRO (Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Last-Mile Delivery buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- QuickFork forklift AMRChina
- Reeman Giraffe PROChina
Year First Available
- QuickFork forklift AMR2014
- Reeman Giraffe PRO—
Verified Deployments
- QuickFork forklift AMR0 Deployments
- Reeman Giraffe PRO0 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- QuickFork forklift AMR8 hrs
- Reeman Giraffe PRO8 hrs
Availability Status
- QuickFork forklift AMRACTIVE
- Reeman Giraffe PROACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- QuickFork forklift AMR1,500 kg
- Reeman Giraffe PRO—
AMR Subtype
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- Reeman Giraffe PROother
Length
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO704 mm
Width
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO470 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- Reeman Giraffe PROlidar slam
Localization Accuracy
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO70 mm
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- Reeman Giraffe PROlifepo4
Battery Capacity
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO1 kWh
Runtime (Loaded)
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO8 hrs
Charging Time
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO7 hrs
Auto Docking
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PROYes
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- QuickFork forklift AMRWES, WCS, RCS
- Reeman Giraffe PRO—
Commercial
Pricing Models
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PROcapex
Warranty
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- Reeman Giraffe PRO1 yrs
QuickFork forklift AMRamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 69.9Robo Score | | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Last-Mile Delivery buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype | other | other |
| Length (values differ) | — | 704 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 470 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | lidar slam |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 70 mm |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | lifepo4 |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1 kWh |
| Runtime (Loaded) (values differ) | — | 8 hrs |
| Charging Time (values differ) | — | 7 hrs |
| Auto Docking (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | WES, WCS, RCS | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | capex |
| Warranty (values differ) | — | 1 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Opportunity Charging, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | QuickFork forklift AMR | Reeman Giraffe PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
QuickFork forklift AMR, Reeman Giraffe PRO have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes QuickFork forklift AMR and Reeman Giraffe PRO?
QuickFork forklift AMR is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. Reeman Giraffe PRO is made by Shenzhen Reeman Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do QuickFork forklift AMR and Reeman Giraffe PRO compare on the Robo Score?
QuickFork forklift AMR scores 69.9 on the Robo Score. Reeman Giraffe PRO scores 45.4. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are QuickFork forklift AMR and Reeman Giraffe PRO in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between QuickFork forklift AMR and Reeman Giraffe PRO?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
QuickFork forklift AMR vs Reeman Giraffe PRO compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.