QuickFork forklift AMR vs SLV-SW1500
Side-by-side comparison of QuickFork forklift AMR (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and SLV-SW1500 (Luoyang Rock Precision Engineering Co., Ltd.) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- QuickFork forklift AMRChina
- SLV-SW1500China
Year First Available
- QuickFork forklift AMR2014
- SLV-SW1500—
Verified Deployments
- QuickFork forklift AMR0 Deployments
- SLV-SW15000 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Battery / Shift Runtime
- QuickFork forklift AMR8 hrs
- SLV-SW15006 hrs
Availability Status
- QuickFork forklift AMRACTIVE
- SLV-SW1500ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- QuickFork forklift AMR1,500 kg
- SLV-SW1500—
AMR Subtype
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- SLV-SW1500—
Length
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15001,210 mm
Width
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW1500892 mm
Turning Radius
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15001,412 mm
Min Aisle Width
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15001,000 mm
Ground Clearance
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW150030 mm
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- SLV-SW1500lidar slam,qs code,reflector
Localization Accuracy
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15005 mm
Docking Repeatability
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15005 mm
Performance
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15001.5 m/s
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- QuickFork forklift AMRother
- SLV-SW1500lifepo4
Battery Capacity
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW15001.9 kWh
Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- QuickFork forklift AMRWES, WCS, RCS
- SLV-SW1500—
Commercial
Pricing Models
- QuickFork forklift AMR—
- SLV-SW1500capex
QuickFork forklift AMRamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 69.9Robo Score | | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country | China | China |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | 8 hrs | 6 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1,500 kg | — |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | — |
| Length (values differ) | — | 1,210 mm |
| Width (values differ) | — | 892 mm |
| Turning Radius (values differ) | — | 1,412 mm |
| Min Aisle Width (values differ) | — | 1,000 mm |
| Ground Clearance (values differ) | — | 30 mm |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | lidar slam,qs code,reflector |
| Localization Accuracy (values differ) | — | 5 mm |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | — | 5 mm |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | — | 1.5 m/s |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | other | lifepo4 |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 1.9 kWh |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | WES, WCS, RCS | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Pricing Models (values differ) | — | capex |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Robot Weight, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | QuickFork forklift AMR | SLV-SW1500 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
QuickFork forklift AMR, SLV-SW1500 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes QuickFork forklift AMR and SLV-SW1500?
QuickFork forklift AMR is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. SLV-SW1500 is made by Luoyang Rock Precision Engineering Co., Ltd., based in CN.
How do QuickFork forklift AMR and SLV-SW1500 compare on the Robo Score?
QuickFork forklift AMR scores 69.9 on the Robo Score. SLV-SW1500 scores 45.5. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are QuickFork forklift AMR and SLV-SW1500 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between QuickFork forklift AMR and SLV-SW1500?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
QuickFork forklift AMR vs SLV-SW1500 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.