QuickGo goods-to-person AMR vs RB-THERON
Side-by-side comparison of QuickGo goods-to-person AMR (Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.) and RB-THERON (Robotnik) — specs, pricing, Robo Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Warehousing & Logistics buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRChina

- RB-THERONSpain

Year First Available
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMR2014

- RB-THERON—

Verified Deployments
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMR0 Deployments

- RB-THERON0 Deployments

Layer 2: Operational
Price
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRContact for quote

- RB-THERON$31,166–$43,506 USD

Battery / Shift Runtime
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMR8 hrs

- RB-THERON8 hrs

Availability Status
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRACTIVE

- RB-THERONACTIVE

Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMR2,000 kg

- RB-THERON200 kg

AMR Subtype
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRother

- RB-THERONunit load carrier

Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRother

- RB-THERONslam natural

Battery
Battery Chemistry
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRother

- RB-THERONother

Connectivity
WMS Integrations
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRWES, WCS, RCS

- RB-THERON—

Commercial
Price (USD)
- QuickGo goods-to-person AMRContact for quote

- RB-THERON$31,166–$43,506 USD

![]() QuickGo goods-to-person AMRamr-warehouseShanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. 70.0Robo Score | ||
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | Spain |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2014 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price (values differ) | Contact for quote | $31,166–$43,506 USD |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Warehousing & Logistics buyers) (values differ) | 2,000 kg | 200 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | other | unit load carrier |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | other | slam natural |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry | other | other |
| Connectivity | ||
| WMS Integrations (values differ) | WES, WCS, RCS | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $31,166–$43,506 USD |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Length, Width, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Docking Repeatability, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Pedestrian Detection, Max Speed (Loaded), Max Speed (Unloaded), Picks / Hour / Robot, Battery Capacity, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Emergency Stops, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, API Type, Fleet Size Supported, Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | QuickGo goods-to-person AMR | RB-THERON |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | $37,336 |
| Payback period | — | 9.0 mo |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | $212,664 |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | +570% |
QuickGo goods-to-person AMR has no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes QuickGo goods-to-person AMR and RB-THERON?
QuickGo goods-to-person AMR is made by Shanghai Quicktron Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. RB-THERON is made by Robotnik, based in ES.
How do QuickGo goods-to-person AMR and RB-THERON compare on the Robo Score?
QuickGo goods-to-person AMR scores 70.0 on the Robo Score. RB-THERON scores 65.1. The Robo Score is a 0–100 credibility figure blending commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are QuickGo goods-to-person AMR and RB-THERON in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between QuickGo goods-to-person AMR and RB-THERON?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
QuickGo goods-to-person AMR vs RB-THERON compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Score is calculated.