Side-by-side comparison of RDT401 (Foshan Ruipuhua Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd.) and YASAKAWA/MOTOMAN GP 50 (YASAKAWA) — specs, pricing, Robolist Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Manufacturing buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Manufacturer Country


Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Availability Status


Reach


Repeatability


Payload


IP Rating (Arm)


Degrees of Freedom


Max TCP Speed


Robot Weight


IP Rating (Wrist)


Duty Cycle


Vibration Damping


Safety Category


Dual Check Safety


Safety I/O Pairs


Controller Model


Programming Languages


Teach Pendant Type


Offline Programming


Digital Twin Support


ROS-Industrial Support


IoT / Cloud Platform


Cybersecurity Certs


Predictive Maintenance


Tool Flange Standard


Tool Changer (ISO)


Internal Cable Routing


Electrical Lines


Price (USD)


Warranty


Service Network


Expected Service Life


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | — |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2012 | — |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $30,000–$39,900 |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Arm Mechanics | ||
| Reach (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 200 mm | 2,061 mm |
| Repeatability (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | ±0.1 mm | ±0.03 mm |
| Payload (priority for Manufacturing buyers) (values differ) | 1 kg | 50 kg |
| IP Rating (Arm) (priority for Manufacturing buyers) | IP54 | IP54 |
| Degrees of Freedom (values differ) | 4 | 6 |
| Max TCP Speed (values differ) | 4 m/s | — |
| Robot Weight (values differ) | 85 kg | 570 kg |
| IP Rating (Wrist) (values differ) | — | IP67 |
| Performance | ||
| Duty Cycle (values differ) | multi shift | not specified |
| Vibration Damping (values differ) | — | active model based |
| Safety | ||
| Safety Category (values differ) | — | Cat.3 PLd |
| Dual Check Safety (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Safety I/O Pairs (values differ) | 24 | — |
| Controller & Programming | ||
| Controller Model (values differ) | — | YRC1000 |
| Programming Languages (values differ) | — | INFORM |
| Teach Pendant Type (values differ) | — | wired touch |
| Offline Programming (values differ) | — | MotoSim |
| Digital Twin Support (values differ) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| ROS-Industrial Support (values differ) | none | vendor supported |
| IoT / Cloud Platform (values differ) | — | Yaskawa Cockpit |
| Cybersecurity Certs (values differ) | — | IEC 62443 SL1, IEC 62443 SL2 |
| Predictive Maintenance (values differ) | — | ml based |
| End-Effector | ||
| Tool Flange Standard (values differ) | — | ISO 9409-1 |
| Tool Changer (ISO) (values differ) | none | proprietary |
| Internal Cable Routing (values differ) | external only | through arm and wrist |
| Electrical Lines (values differ) | 10 | — |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | $20,000 | $30,000–$39,900 |
| Warranty (values differ) | 2 yrs | — |
| Service Network (values differ) | regional | global |
| Expected Service Life (values differ) | — | 15 yrs |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Battery / Shift Runtime, Path Accuracy, Cycle Time (25/305/25), MTBF, E-Stop Response, Safe Zone Count, Communication Protocols, Pneumatic Lines, Spare Parts Lead Time
Frequently asked
RDT401 is made by Foshan Ruipuhua Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd., based in CN. YASAKAWA/MOTOMAN GP 50 is made by YASAKAWA.
RDT401 scores 97/100. YASAKAWA/MOTOMAN GP 50 scores 83/100. The Robolist Index blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
RDT401 has a reach of 200 mm. YASAKAWA/MOTOMAN GP 50 has a reach of 2061 mm.
Both robots are classified as Industrial Arm on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Industrial Arm TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
TCO of a 6-Axis Arm Cell: Hardware, EOAT, Integration, Programming
7 min readIndustrial Arms
Industrial Arm Vendor Selection: Capability Matrices and Proof Points
9 min readIndustrial Arms
Programming Approaches: Teach Pendant, Offline, AI-Assisted — What Each Costs You
8 min readIndustrial Arms
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
RDT401 vs YASAKAWA/MOTOMAN GP 50 compares two robots in the industrial-arm category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Index is calculated.