Side-by-side comparison of RH5 Manus (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH) and Sanbot Nano (Sanbot Innovation Technology) — specs, pricing, Robolist Product Score, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Healthcare & Hospitals buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Year First Available


Verified Deployments


Price Range (USD)


Battery / Shift Runtime


Availability Status


Height


Weight


Mobility Type


Humanoid Subtype


Walking Speed


Running Capable


Stair Climbing


Terrain


Payload


Total DOF


Arm DOF


Hand DOF


Bimanual Coordination


Tool Use


Onboard Compute


Compute Platform


VLM Capable


Imitation Learning


Teleoperation


Programming


Runtime


Battery Capacity


Charging Method


Force-Limited Arms


Fall Recovery


Human Detection Method


Safe Speed Near Humans


SDK Languages


ROS Support


Simulation Platforms


Open API


Air-Gap Capable


Deployment Maturity


Price (USD)


Price Tier


Pricing Model


Applications


![]() | ![]() | |
|---|---|---|
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2022 | 2017 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Price Range (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
| Battery / Shift Runtime (values differ) | — | 4 hrs |
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Physical Form Factor | ||
| Height (values differ) | 187 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Weight (values differ) | 36 kg | 19 kg |
| Mobility Type (values differ) | bipedal | wheeled |
| Humanoid Subtype (values differ) | full bipedal | wheeled humanoid |
| Walking Speed (values differ) | 0.5 m/s | 0.8 m/s |
| Running Capable (values differ) | static walk | — |
| Stair Climbing | none | none |
| Terrain (values differ) | flat_indoor | flat_indoor |
| Payload & Dexterity | ||
| Payload (values differ) | 4 kg | 75 kg |
| Total DOF (values differ) | 19 | 8 |
| Arm DOF (values differ) | 7 | 10 |
| Hand DOF (values differ) | 4 | 10 |
| Bimanual Coordination (values differ) | full bimanual | — |
| Tool Use (values differ) | vendor demo | — |
| Compute & AI | ||
| Onboard Compute (values differ) | DFKI electronic stack with FPGA for motor control | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| Compute Platform (values differ) | — | Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 |
| VLM Capable | none | none |
| Imitation Learning (values differ) | single task | — |
| Teleoperation (values differ) | vr_headset, full_body_suit | joystick |
| Programming (values differ) | teleoperation | code_python, teleoperation |
| Battery & Power | ||
| Runtime (values differ) | — | 10 hrs |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | — | 0.3 kWh |
| Charging Method (values differ) | tethered | — |
| Safety | ||
| Force-Limited Arms (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Fall Recovery (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Human Detection Method (values differ) | generic obstacle | vision human |
| Safe Speed Near Humans (values differ) | none | — |
| Software | ||
| SDK Languages (values differ) | Python, C++, ROS2 | Python |
| ROS Support (values differ) | ros2 community | ros1 community |
| Simulation Platforms (values differ) | MARS | — |
| Open API (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Air-Gap Capable (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Deployment Maturity (values differ) | prototype | production pilot |
| Commercial | ||
| Price (USD) (values differ) | Contact for quote | $3,000 |
| Price Tier (values differ) | — | 10-20K |
| Pricing Model (values differ) | — | capex |
| Applications (values differ) | assembly | home, education, healthcare, public_service |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Manufacturer Country, Payload (Peak), Arm Reach, Grip Strength, Manipulation Repeatability, Foundation Models, Charging Time, Battery Swap, Avg Power Consumption, Fall Detection Response, Emergency Stops, MTBF, Task Success Rate, IP Rating, Noise Level, RaaS / Month, Developer Unit Price, Delivery Lead Time, Warranty, Production Pilots
Frequently asked
RH5 Manus is made by German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence GmbH. Sanbot Nano is made by Sanbot Innovation Technology.
RH5 Manus launched in 2022. Sanbot Nano launched in 2017.
RH5 Manus scores 46/100. Sanbot Nano scores 56/100. The Product Score blends specs, pricing transparency, verified deployments, and independent media coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
RH5 Manus carries up to 4 kg. Sanbot Nano carries up to 75 kg.
Both robots are classified as Humanoid on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
Hardware cost is one input. Humanoid TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time.
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
Humanoid TCO: Hardware, Cloud Subscriptions, and the Cost of Teleop Time
8 min readHumanoid Robots
Vendor Selection for Humanoids: The 10 Questions You Must Ask
10 min readHumanoid Robots
Running a Humanoid Pilot: Scope, Success Criteria, and Exit Options
9 min readHumanoid Robots
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
RH5 Manus vs Sanbot Nano compares two robots in the humanoid category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robolist Product Score is calculated.