S100C vs T3
Side-by-side comparison of S100C (Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd.) and T3 (Aethon) — specs, pricing, Robo Index, and verified deployments. Updated daily.
Optimize comparison for buyer
Optimized for Cleaning & Facilities buyers. Priority specs lifted to the top and marked with a target.
Layer 1: Identity & Trust
Manufacturer Country
- S100CChina
- T3United States
Year First Available
- S100C2020
- T32015
Verified Deployments
- S100C0 Deployments
- T30 Deployments
Layer 2: Operational
Availability Status
- S100CACTIVE
- T3ACTIVE
Payload & Form Factor
Payload
- S100C100 kg
- T3453.6 kg
AMR Subtype
- S100Csortation amr
- T3tugger tractor
Length
- S100C560 mm
- T3—
Width
- S100C600 mm
- T3—
Navigation & Sensing
Navigation Type
- S100Chybrid slam
- T3hybrid
Docking Repeatability
- S100C10 mm
- T3—
Pedestrian Detection
- S100CYes
- T3—
Performance
Max Speed (Loaded)
- S100C2.5 m/s
- T3—
Max Speed (Unloaded)
- S100C2 m/s
- T3—
Battery
Battery Chemistry
- S100Cli ion nmc
- T3li ion
Battery Capacity
- S100C0.6 kWh
- T3—
Safety
Emergency Stops
- S100C2
- T3—
Connectivity
API Type
- S100Copen rest
- T3—
Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt
- S100CYes
- T3—
| Layer 1: Identity & Trust | ||
| Manufacturer Country (values differ) | China | United States |
| Year First Available (values differ) | 2020 | 2015 |
| Verified Deployments | 0 Deployments | 0 Deployments |
| Layer 2: Operational | ||
| Availability Status | ACTIVE | ACTIVE |
| Layer 3: Category Specific | ||
| Payload & Form Factor | ||
| Payload (priority for Cleaning & Facilities buyers) (values differ) | 100 kg | 453.6 kg |
| AMR Subtype (values differ) | sortation amr | tugger tractor |
| Length (values differ) | 560 mm | — |
| Width (values differ) | 600 mm | — |
| Navigation & Sensing | ||
| Navigation Type (values differ) | hybrid slam | hybrid |
| Docking Repeatability (values differ) | 10 mm | — |
| Pedestrian Detection (values differ) | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Max Speed (Loaded) (values differ) | 2.5 m/s | — |
| Max Speed (Unloaded) (values differ) | 2 m/s | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Chemistry (values differ) | li ion nmc | li ion |
| Battery Capacity (values differ) | 0.6 kWh | — |
| Safety | ||
| Emergency Stops (values differ) | 2 | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| API Type (values differ) | open rest | — |
| Multi-Robot Traffic Mgmt (values differ) | Yes | — |
Insufficient data for full comparison
The following fields had no data for any of the selected robots: Price, Battery / Shift Runtime, Turning Radius, Min Aisle Width, Ground Clearance, Robot Weight, Localization Accuracy, Obstacle Detection Range, Min Object Detection Height, Picks / Hour / Robot, Runtime (Loaded), Charging Time, Opportunity Charging, Auto Docking, Battery Swap, Charge Cycles (Rated), ISO 3691-4 Certified, R15.08 Certified, Safety Category, Safety LiDAR Coverage, Safety Zone Count, Audible Alert, WMS Integrations, Fleet Size Supported, OTA Updates, Cybersecurity Certs, MTBF, Uptime SLA, Predictive Maintenance, Field Service Response, Spare Parts Lead Time, Price (USD), RaaS / Month, Pricing Models, Warranty, Expected Service Life
ROI Comparison
Same operating assumptions across every robot — the only difference is price. Set your numbers once to see which pays back fastest.
Annual labor displaced (per robot): $50,000
| Metric | S100C | T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Investment | No price | No price |
| Payback period | — | — |
| Net savings (5 yr) | — | — |
| ROI (5 yr) | — | — |
S100C, T3 have no listed price, so payback can't be computed. Contact the manufacturer for a quote.
Estimates labor-cost displacement only — not a full total cost of ownership. Actual ROI depends on integration, maintenance, training, downtime, and task fit. Converted currencies are indicative; USD is the price of record.
Trade-offs at a glance
Frequently asked
Who makes S100C and T3?
S100C is made by Beijing Geekplus Technology Co., Ltd., based in CN. T3 is made by Aethon, based in US.
When were S100C and T3 launched?
S100C launched in 2020. T3 launched in 2015.
How do S100C and T3 compare on the Robo Index?
S100C grades A on the Robo Index. T3 grades AA. The Robo Index is a credibility grade (AAA … C) that blends commercial maturity, verified deployments, company standing, and independent coverage — see methodology for the full breakdown.
Are S100C and T3 in the same category?
Both robots are classified as Amr Warehouse on Robolist. Filters and ranking treat them as direct alternatives.
What is the realistic total cost of ownership for Amr Warehouse robots?
Hardware cost is one input. Amr Warehouse TCO also includes integration, training, downtime, and end-of-life. Our breakdown: AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration.
What should a buyer ask vendors when choosing between S100C and T3?
Spec sheets only show part of the story. Useful vendor questions cover support, lifecycle, integration cost, and references. We have a buyer-focused checklist: AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling.
Going deeper — picking the right robot
AMR TCO: Fleet Size, Charging Infrastructure, and WMS Integration
8 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Vendor Selection: Orchestration, Integration, and Scaling
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
AMR Pilot in an Existing Warehouse: The 90-Day Playbook
9 min readWarehouse AMRs
Build vs buy vs lease: which model fits a first deployment
8 min readChoosing Your First Robot
The hidden specs vendors hope you'll miss
10 min readReading the Spec Sheet
Want to be notified when specs or pricing change for these robots? Drop your email.
Other comparisons
About this comparison
S100C vs T3 compares two robots in the amr-warehouse category. All data is sourced from manufacturer spec sheets, verified deployments, and third-party filings; see our methodology for how the Robo Index is calculated.